Everything about Reproducibility totally explained
Reproducibility is one of the main principles of the
scientific method, and refers to the ability of a test or
experiment to be accurately reproduced, or
replicated, by someone else working independently.
Reproducibility is different from
repeatability, which measures the success rate in successive experiments, possibly conducted by the same experimenters. Reproducibility relates to the agreement of test results with different operators, test apparatus, and laboratory locations. It is often reported as a
standard deviation.
While repeatability of scientific experiments is desirable, it isn't considered necessary to establish the scientific validity of a theory. For example, the
cloning of animals is difficult to repeat, but has been reproduced by various teams working independently, and is a well established research domain. One failed cloning doesn't mean that the theory is wrong or unscientific. Repeatability is often low in
protosciences.
The results of an experiment performed by a particular
researcher or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers by reproducing the original experiment. They repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description, and see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group. The result values are said to be
commensurate if they're obtained (in distinct experimental trials) according to the same reproducible experimental description and procedure.
The basic idea can be seen in
Aristotle's dictum that there's no scientific knowledge of the individual, where the word used for
individual in Greek had the connotation of the
idiosyncratic, or wholly isolated occurrence. Thus all knowledge, all science, necessarily involves the formation of general concepts and the invocation of their corresponding symbols in language (cf. Turner).
Famous problems
In March 1989,
University of Utah chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann reported the production of excess heat that could only be explained by a nuclear process. The report was astounding given the simplicity of the equipment: it was essentially an
electrolysis cell containing
heavy water and a
palladium cathode which rapidly absorbed the
deuterium produced during electrolysis. The news media reported on the experiments widely, and it was a front-page item on many newspapers around the world. Over the next several months others tried to replicate the experiment, but were unsuccessful. At the end of May the US Energy Research Advisory Board found the evidence to be unconvincing, and
cold fusion was dismissed as
pseudoscience. Later on, successful replications by independent teams were reported in peer reviewed scientific journals, and, although the effect isn't considered fully repeatable, the field eventually gained some scientific recognition.
In the 1930's the Austrian scientist
Wilhelm Reich claimed to have discovered a physical energy he called "
orgone," and which he said existed in the atmosphere and in all living matter. He developed instruments to detect and harness this energy that he said could be used to treat illness or control the weather. His views were not accepted by the mainstream scientific community; in fact, he was vilified for his claims. In the early 1940's Reich encouraged
Albert Einstein to test an orgone accumulator, which Einstein did, but he disagreed on the interpretation of the results. In 2001, Canadian researchers Paulo Correa and Alexandra Correa claimed to have successfully reproduced the experiment. But
Martin Gardner's book,
Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science debunks orgone energy.
Nikola Tesla claimed as early as 1899 to have used a high frequency current to light gas-filled lamps from over away
without using wires. In 1904 he built
Wardenclyffe Tower on
Long Island to demonstrate means to send and receive power without connecting wires. The facility was never fully operational and wasn't completed, supposedly due to economic problems. Tesla's experiments have never been replicated.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Reproducibility'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://reproducibility.totallyexplained.com">Reproducibility Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |